<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A MORAL GUARDIAN GETS THE FJM TREATMENT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/</link>
	<description>OPIATE OF THE ASSES</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Warneka</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-11667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Warneka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1094#comment-11667</guid>
		<description>Funny analysis! :-)

There are some Catholics willing to think more broadly:

http://catholicservantleader.blogspot.com/2008/09/which-presidential-candidate-better.html

Keep up the awesome blogging...(and please give advance notice if you ever choose to skewer one of my blogs! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny analysis! :-)</p>
<p>There are some Catholics willing to think more broadly:</p>
<p><a href="http://catholicservantleader.blogspot.com/2008/09/which-presidential-candidate-better.html" rel="nofollow">http://catholicservantleader.blogspot.com/2008/09/which-presidential-candidate-better.html</a></p>
<p>Keep up the awesome blogging&#8230;(and please give advance notice if you ever choose to skewer one of my blogs! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-11666</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1094#comment-11666</guid>
		<description>&quot;Abortuaries&quot; just knocked &quot;scientician&quot; out of the #1 spot of made up and hilarious words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Abortuaries&#034; just knocked &#034;scientician&#034; out of the #1 spot of made up and hilarious words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-11665</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1094#comment-11665</guid>
		<description>On my way home from the airport in Omaha a few weeks ago the only thing I could find worth listening to was an interview with a Bishop on catholic radio about this particular issue.  (Truly radio in Omaha is that bad, okay to be fair I was in the mood for talk radio, so choices were real limited.)  I found his arguments to be quite scary.  Not only did he say that Catholics should not vote for pro-life candidates, but that any public figure who was catholic and did not take an adamant pro-life stance ought to be denied communion for knowingly committing a sin without repentance.  In addition, anyone who supported him, or if we could only get the records, voted for him ought to be denied the sacrament as well.  While some accused him of bringing politics into the church, his response was that the giving the most holy of sacraments to known sinners completely degraded the entire act and was in itself a sin, thereby making those in the church who knowingly gave communion to these &quot;sinners&quot; also ineligible for the cracker and wine.
I was completely floored by this line of reasoning, and even more worried when I realized how effective it might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my way home from the airport in Omaha a few weeks ago the only thing I could find worth listening to was an interview with a Bishop on catholic radio about this particular issue.  (Truly radio in Omaha is that bad, okay to be fair I was in the mood for talk radio, so choices were real limited.)  I found his arguments to be quite scary.  Not only did he say that Catholics should not vote for pro-life candidates, but that any public figure who was catholic and did not take an adamant pro-life stance ought to be denied communion for knowingly committing a sin without repentance.  In addition, anyone who supported him, or if we could only get the records, voted for him ought to be denied the sacrament as well.  While some accused him of bringing politics into the church, his response was that the giving the most holy of sacraments to known sinners completely degraded the entire act and was in itself a sin, thereby making those in the church who knowingly gave communion to these &#034;sinners&#034; also ineligible for the cracker and wine.<br />
I was completely floored by this line of reasoning, and even more worried when I realized how effective it might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Dryden</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2008/09/29/a-moral-guardian-gets-the-fjm-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-11664</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Dryden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1094#comment-11664</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase Voltaire, the Institute of Divine Mercy is neither divine nor merciful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase Voltaire, the Institute of Divine Mercy is neither divine nor merciful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

