<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SYMBOLIC VICTORIES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/</link>
	<description>OPIATE OF THE ASSES</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: getting back ex boyfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-63963</link>
		<dc:creator>getting back ex boyfriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-63963</guid>
		<description>I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours lately, but I by no means discovered any interesting article like yours. It&#039;s beautiful price enough for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours lately, but I by no means discovered any interesting article like yours. It&#039;s beautiful price enough for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polypropylene :</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-35518</link>
		<dc:creator>Polypropylene :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-35518</guid>
		<description>well, womens issues are centered on things which involves a woman&#039;s feelings.`~*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, womens issues are centered on things which involves a woman&#039;s feelings.`~*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-33712</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-33712</guid>
		<description>there are lots of women issues that are mostly related to relationships and family~.:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are lots of women issues that are mostly related to relationships and family~.:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hah-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-21752</link>
		<dc:creator>Hah-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-21752</guid>
		<description>I love pro-lifers. Highly entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love pro-lifers. Highly entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-16023</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-16023</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that you won&#039;t discuss it, anymore, Ed.  Really. I mean it.  I know things got heated in here for a bit and I think that has a lot to do with the perception that the correction on facts was being ignored so that folks could continue pearl-clutching about situations that just aren&#039;t based in any reality.  It could have all been avoided with a simple, &quot;huh.  I did not know that.  I sit corrected&quot; by some.  Your blog, your house, your decision.  Of course, as it should be.

I just wonder...what would you say if I pointed out that the conversations you most often call a halt to, say you just won&#039;t talk about &#039;it&#039; anymore, the ones you and your commentors most frequently call &quot;illogical&quot; and &quot;boring&quot; and immediately mock are those that involve women, women&#039;s issues and checking y&#039;all&#039;s male privilege in some way? I find it interesting, myself.  

And I&#039;m glad that I wasn&#039;t here for this one and that my comment is coming so late.  That way, I know you&#039;ll be the only one who sees it, most likely.  I hope that means that you&#039;ll be more likely to really think about my point.  (If you don&#039;t believe me, try it.  Post on some issue that&#039;s seen as a contentious &#039;women&#039;s issue&#039; and watch what happens in comments.  Pick one.  Pay gap.  Household labor division issues.  Oo, that last one will get it, no problem. Rape. Child support issues.  Any of &#039;em really. )  

I did think about yours and I think you&#039;re dead right.  I&#039;m glad his partner is taking over and opening his own clinic in KS.  However, that means there is precisely one doctor who does this procedure and only one.  He might as well get used to the Kevlar medical scrubs.  I&#039;m afraid he&#039;ll need them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a shame that you won&#039;t discuss it, anymore, Ed.  Really. I mean it.  I know things got heated in here for a bit and I think that has a lot to do with the perception that the correction on facts was being ignored so that folks could continue pearl-clutching about situations that just aren&#039;t based in any reality.  It could have all been avoided with a simple, &#034;huh.  I did not know that.  I sit corrected&#034; by some.  Your blog, your house, your decision.  Of course, as it should be.</p>
<p>I just wonder&#8230;what would you say if I pointed out that the conversations you most often call a halt to, say you just won&#039;t talk about &#039;it&#039; anymore, the ones you and your commentors most frequently call &#034;illogical&#034; and &#034;boring&#034; and immediately mock are those that involve women, women&#039;s issues and checking y&#039;all&#039;s male privilege in some way? I find it interesting, myself.  </p>
<p>And I&#039;m glad that I wasn&#039;t here for this one and that my comment is coming so late.  That way, I know you&#039;ll be the only one who sees it, most likely.  I hope that means that you&#039;ll be more likely to really think about my point.  (If you don&#039;t believe me, try it.  Post on some issue that&#039;s seen as a contentious &#039;women&#039;s issue&#039; and watch what happens in comments.  Pick one.  Pay gap.  Household labor division issues.  Oo, that last one will get it, no problem. Rape. Child support issues.  Any of &#039;em really. )  </p>
<p>I did think about yours and I think you&#039;re dead right.  I&#039;m glad his partner is taking over and opening his own clinic in KS.  However, that means there is precisely one doctor who does this procedure and only one.  He might as well get used to the Kevlar medical scrubs.  I&#039;m afraid he&#039;ll need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahMC</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-15758</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-15758</guid>
		<description>You have not addressed the criticism, Ed.  I, for one, am not applying a litmus test to anyone.  I am calling you on your apparent ignorance regarding third term abortion.  When you say you have a moral problem with it you are saying you have a moral problem with abortions that are performed to preserve the mother&#039;s health/life and abortions that are performed on fetuses whose deformities are incompatible with life.  Full stop.  IF you do have a problem with abortions performed in either of those cases, fine, but it didn&#039;t seem like you - or a couple other commenters - realized that those are the only cases in which abortion is permitted in the third trimester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have not addressed the criticism, Ed.  I, for one, am not applying a litmus test to anyone.  I am calling you on your apparent ignorance regarding third term abortion.  When you say you have a moral problem with it you are saying you have a moral problem with abortions that are performed to preserve the mother&#039;s health/life and abortions that are performed on fetuses whose deformities are incompatible with life.  Full stop.  IF you do have a problem with abortions performed in either of those cases, fine, but it didn&#039;t seem like you &#8211; or a couple other commenters &#8211; realized that those are the only cases in which abortion is permitted in the third trimester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbsmall</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-15747</link>
		<dc:creator>dbsmall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-15747</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad this commentstream is now about abortion.  The original article was about classification of terrorist acts, and about policy/response to them.

For my own deviation from that topic, Ed, I apologize.  If I could edit that out of my first comment, I would.

And I stand by my contention that---if the right Right response to terrorism is to respond strongly, and to cut off the funding, then they should be actively ferreting out the folks &lt;i&gt;behind&lt;/i&gt; Roeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s too bad this commentstream is now about abortion.  The original article was about classification of terrorist acts, and about policy/response to them.</p>
<p>For my own deviation from that topic, Ed, I apologize.  If I could edit that out of my first comment, I would.</p>
<p>And I stand by my contention that&#8212;if the right Right response to terrorism is to respond strongly, and to cut off the funding, then they should be actively ferreting out the folks <i>behind</i> Roeder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-15745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-15745</guid>
		<description>And to answer Amelia, I think a good option would have been to keep the clinic open to provide medical services to women since, like the average Planned Parenthood, I&#039;m going to assume that performing abortions constituted about 1% of what the clinic in question did for its patients.

Also, j&#039;s comment wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to answer Amelia, I think a good option would have been to keep the clinic open to provide medical services to women since, like the average Planned Parenthood, I&#039;m going to assume that performing abortions constituted about 1% of what the clinic in question did for its patients.</p>
<p>Also, j&#039;s comment wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/06/10/symbolic-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-15744</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=1987#comment-15744</guid>
		<description>Pilgrim, I can&#039;t control the male-female balance of my readership, nor the male tendency to be more vocal in debates because we assume that what we have to say is really important.

This thread, and the ensuing comments, have reinforced why I don&#039;t talk about abortion. The subtlety gets lost pretty quickly (something on the order of *immediately*).

Let me be more emphatic that I fully support legal access to abortion throughout pregnancy. That I have personal moral questions about certain abortion procedures isn&#039;t relevant, as I am not a pro-lifer and thus don&#039;t feel that the purpose of government is to legislate my moral beliefs onto others.

I&#039;ve generally found that extensive litmus testing (Are you pro-choice enough? You&#039;re not allowed to have any reservations about abortion. You&#039;re MALE, and thus your opinion is inherently less valid.) is an ineffective way to rally support in a nation in which 80% of the public is staunchly wishy-washy. Men have the luxury of discussing this issue as a hypothetical, and I accept your criticism on that account. Overall, however, the &quot;fuck you how dare you&quot; tone of the criticism in these comments goes a long way toward explaining why people who would otherwise be actively involved in the pro-choice movement walk away. If your goal was to enforce silence, you&#039;ve succeeded, because I can guarantee I&#039;ll not be discussing this issue again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pilgrim, I can&#039;t control the male-female balance of my readership, nor the male tendency to be more vocal in debates because we assume that what we have to say is really important.</p>
<p>This thread, and the ensuing comments, have reinforced why I don&#039;t talk about abortion. The subtlety gets lost pretty quickly (something on the order of *immediately*).</p>
<p>Let me be more emphatic that I fully support legal access to abortion throughout pregnancy. That I have personal moral questions about certain abortion procedures isn&#039;t relevant, as I am not a pro-lifer and thus don&#039;t feel that the purpose of government is to legislate my moral beliefs onto others.</p>
<p>I&#039;ve generally found that extensive litmus testing (Are you pro-choice enough? You&#039;re not allowed to have any reservations about abortion. You&#039;re MALE, and thus your opinion is inherently less valid.) is an ineffective way to rally support in a nation in which 80% of the public is staunchly wishy-washy. Men have the luxury of discussing this issue as a hypothetical, and I accept your criticism on that account. Overall, however, the &#034;fuck you how dare you&#034; tone of the criticism in these comments goes a long way toward explaining why people who would otherwise be actively involved in the pro-choice movement walk away. If your goal was to enforce silence, you&#039;ve succeeded, because I can guarantee I&#039;ll not be discussing this issue again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

