<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CRTL-F</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/</link>
	<description>OPIATE OF THE ASSES</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:36:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignatov</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-17019</link>
		<dc:creator>ignatov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-17019</guid>
		<description>Current ranking:

#1 in   Books &gt; Nonfiction &gt; Current Events &gt; Conspiracy Theories</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current ranking:</p>
<p>#1 in   Books &gt; Nonfiction &gt; Current Events &gt; Conspiracy Theories</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16913</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16913</guid>
		<description>Wingnut welfare can undoubtedly pay for quite a few  ghostwriter/fact-manglers working simultaneously.  Malkin then comes along and punches the raw material up with her trademark shrillness.  Voila!  A book, in no time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wingnut welfare can undoubtedly pay for quite a few  ghostwriter/fact-manglers working simultaneously.  Malkin then comes along and punches the raw material up with her trademark shrillness.  Voila!  A book, in no time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waldo</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16881</link>
		<dc:creator>waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16881</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the mainblog-quoted review. 

Malkin = rabid Shi tsu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the mainblog-quoted review. </p>
<p>Malkin = rabid Shi tsu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhak</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16872</link>
		<dc:creator>zhak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16872</guid>
		<description>Excellent post and comments. 

I enjoyed reading. :-)

(I think Malkin is Patient Zero for Extreme Cognitive Dissonance, if anybody cares what I think.)

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post and comments. </p>
<p>I enjoyed reading. :-)</p>
<p>(I think Malkin is Patient Zero for Extreme Cognitive Dissonance, if anybody cares what I think.)</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16866</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16866</guid>
		<description>I have two interesting bits of information re: publishing schedules. Okay, in all fairness, this information is not interesting, but so what? I&#039;m telling you anyway. I was exhorted to make this post by certain parties who shall remain nameless.

The variance in book production schedules is enormous. Even in my relatively small experience in the industry, I have seen the time between the delivery of a final manuscript and books on shelves range from two months to eighteen. Obviously, the more care that goes into the preparation of the manuscript - the intensity of the copy-edit, the thoroughness of the proofreader, and so on - makes a book move toward the higher end of that range.

It is entirely possible that Ms. Malkin got a book deal when Obama was all but assured of victory and finished her book around March. That&#039;s being pretty generous, but assuming that the publisher had no plans of editing the book (why bother?) this is more or less a realistic schedule. She could have taken as much six or eight months &quot;writing&quot; this book. Still, for 376 pages at 6 x 9, I would be shocked if the book was less than 120,000 words. We&#039;re getting into Kerouac &quot;That&#039;s not writing, that&#039;s typing&quot; range here.

And also, the date listed as a book&#039;s publication date is basically meaningless. Books have warehouse dates, release dates, and pub dates. The release date, usually between 2 and 6 weeks before pub date, is actually when people can start seeing books on shelves and getting copies from various websites. Unless it&#039;s a Harry Potter book, nobody really cares if you get it before the official pub date. So it&#039;s not too much of a shock that people are reviewing it quickly.

And don&#039;t take that to mean I&#039;m giving those reviewers the benefit of the doubt - I&#039;m still sure they didn&#039;t read it. But they could have had their copies days or perhaps even weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two interesting bits of information re: publishing schedules. Okay, in all fairness, this information is not interesting, but so what? I&#039;m telling you anyway. I was exhorted to make this post by certain parties who shall remain nameless.</p>
<p>The variance in book production schedules is enormous. Even in my relatively small experience in the industry, I have seen the time between the delivery of a final manuscript and books on shelves range from two months to eighteen. Obviously, the more care that goes into the preparation of the manuscript &#8211; the intensity of the copy-edit, the thoroughness of the proofreader, and so on &#8211; makes a book move toward the higher end of that range.</p>
<p>It is entirely possible that Ms. Malkin got a book deal when Obama was all but assured of victory and finished her book around March. That&#039;s being pretty generous, but assuming that the publisher had no plans of editing the book (why bother?) this is more or less a realistic schedule. She could have taken as much six or eight months &#034;writing&#034; this book. Still, for 376 pages at 6 x 9, I would be shocked if the book was less than 120,000 words. We&#039;re getting into Kerouac &#034;That&#039;s not writing, that&#039;s typing&#034; range here.</p>
<p>And also, the date listed as a book&#039;s publication date is basically meaningless. Books have warehouse dates, release dates, and pub dates. The release date, usually between 2 and 6 weeks before pub date, is actually when people can start seeing books on shelves and getting copies from various websites. Unless it&#039;s a Harry Potter book, nobody really cares if you get it before the official pub date. So it&#039;s not too much of a shock that people are reviewing it quickly.</p>
<p>And don&#039;t take that to mean I&#039;m giving those reviewers the benefit of the doubt &#8211; I&#039;m still sure they didn&#039;t read it. But they could have had their copies days or perhaps even weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16863</guid>
		<description>The previous comment triple-fails. Not relevant, not appropriate, and not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The previous comment triple-fails. Not relevant, not appropriate, and not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timbob</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16862</link>
		<dc:creator>timbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16862</guid>
		<description>at least shes hot.....?

http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2006/images/MalkinBikini_500x380.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at least shes hot&#8230;..?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2006/images/MalkinBikini_500x380.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.windypundit.com/archives/2006/images/MalkinBikini_500x380.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Houghton</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16861</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16861</guid>
		<description>Nah.  Bryan was at least a skilled speaker.

Having Malkin lecture you is like taking your cues from Lenny in &lt;em&gt;Of Mice and Men&lt;/em&gt;, with a strong touch of &quot;justice for thee, not for me&quot; from the woman who wants U.S. cittizenship revoked for those who were born in the U.S.A. of a non-citizen who immigrated less than nine months previously.

You know, such as her mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah.  Bryan was at least a skilled speaker.</p>
<p>Having Malkin lecture you is like taking your cues from Lenny in <em>Of Mice and Men</em>, with a strong touch of &#034;justice for thee, not for me&#034; from the woman who wants U.S. cittizenship revoked for those who were born in the U.S.A. of a non-citizen who immigrated less than nine months previously.</p>
<p>You know, such as her mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Dryden</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2009/08/03/crtl-f/comment-page-1/#comment-16857</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Dryden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=2270#comment-16857</guid>
		<description>I do, in fact, feel like shit about this country now; thanks, Ed. More specifically, I feel like I&#039;m sitting in the middle of the crowd at the Scopes Trial, listening to everyone else around me rumble about how great it is to listen to William Jennnings Bryan really let that no-account Darrow fellow have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do, in fact, feel like shit about this country now; thanks, Ed. More specifically, I feel like I&#039;m sitting in the middle of the crowd at the Scopes Trial, listening to everyone else around me rumble about how great it is to listen to William Jennnings Bryan really let that no-account Darrow fellow have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

