<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MARCEL DUCHAMP vs. HARRY REID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/</link>
	<description>OPIATE OF THE ASSES</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beats by dre australia price</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-84148</link>
		<dc:creator>beats by dre australia price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-84148</guid>
		<description>Aw, this was a very good blog post. In suggestion I would like to put in writing in this way in addition â€“ taking time and even true work to make a very good articleâ€¦ but what can I sayâ€¦ I procrastinate much and practically never seem to get something completed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, this was a very good blog post. In suggestion I would like to put in writing in this way in addition â€“ taking time and even true work to make a very good articleâ€¦ but what can I sayâ€¦ I procrastinate much and practically never seem to get something completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God has a plan that everyone must adhere to - Rantings of a New Yorker</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28745</link>
		<dc:creator>God has a plan that everyone must adhere to - Rantings of a New Yorker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28745</guid>
		<description>[...] only does she have idiotic religious beliefs, she also thinks unemployed people are lazy. Get this woman off the planet now before she infects more people with her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only does she have idiotic religious beliefs, she also thinks unemployed people are lazy. Get this woman off the planet now before she infects more people with her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hopeless</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hopeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28569</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s not alone. Pissing on the unemployed is a new Republican meme. Don&#039;t ask me why...shouldn&#039;t they be weeping for the poor unemployed, since it&#039;s all Obama&#039;s fault anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#039;s not alone. Pissing on the unemployed is a new Republican meme. Don&#039;t ask me why&#8230;shouldn&#039;t they be weeping for the poor unemployed, since it&#039;s all Obama&#039;s fault anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28563</guid>
		<description>For the past six months, the Tea Baggers have been clammoring to be heard. Now that we hear them, we realize they have noting worth listening to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past six months, the Tea Baggers have been clammoring to be heard. Now that we hear them, we realize they have noting worth listening to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb in GA</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28549</link>
		<dc:creator>bb in GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28549</guid>
		<description>Nunya:

No one (in that context) deserves to rot.  

As you can tell, I&#039;m biased towards private charity.  I guess my second choice would be public works administered at the most local level possible.  An important part of that program would be a sunset provision since Federal entities seem to be the closest thing to eternal life we get to see on this earth.

Another challenge is to find areas of the economy that are underserved so that the public works don&#039;t crowd out private initiative.

I have observed, first hand, that in the absence of sickness or profound disability, it is destructive of character to provide a long term living for someone without providing them the opportunity to contribute their talents to the process.  At the same time, we are not interested in babies suffering because of the shortcomings of their parents.

This is old wisdom not original to me.

//bb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nunya:</p>
<p>No one (in that context) deserves to rot.  </p>
<p>As you can tell, I&#039;m biased towards private charity.  I guess my second choice would be public works administered at the most local level possible.  An important part of that program would be a sunset provision since Federal entities seem to be the closest thing to eternal life we get to see on this earth.</p>
<p>Another challenge is to find areas of the economy that are underserved so that the public works don&#039;t crowd out private initiative.</p>
<p>I have observed, first hand, that in the absence of sickness or profound disability, it is destructive of character to provide a long term living for someone without providing them the opportunity to contribute their talents to the process.  At the same time, we are not interested in babies suffering because of the shortcomings of their parents.</p>
<p>This is old wisdom not original to me.</p>
<p>//bb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nunya</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28543</link>
		<dc:creator>Nunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28543</guid>
		<description>Nate, not so fast... her poll numbers are dropping like panties on prom night.

Here&#039;s the latest: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_senate

Not that I trust Rasmussen but this may prove that Nevada isn&#039;t as dumb as I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, not so fast&#8230; her poll numbers are dropping like panties on prom night.</p>
<p>Here&#039;s the latest: <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_senate" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/nevada/election_2010_nevada_senate</a></p>
<p>Not that I trust Rasmussen but this may prove that Nevada isn&#039;t as dumb as I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28535</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28535</guid>
		<description>The really crazy thing is Angle&#039;s still up 11% over Reid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really crazy thing is Angle&#039;s still up 11% over Reid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nunya</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28534</link>
		<dc:creator>Nunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28534</guid>
		<description>bb,

Thanks for your service to your fellow man.  I appreciate the effort.

Now, can you explain to me again how those that didn&#039;t utterly screw up their lives deserve to rot after being laid off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bb,</p>
<p>Thanks for your service to your fellow man.  I appreciate the effort.</p>
<p>Now, can you explain to me again how those that didn&#039;t utterly screw up their lives deserve to rot after being laid off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb in GA</title>
		<link>http://www.ginandtacos.com/2010/06/23/marcel-duchamp-vs-harry-reid/comment-page-1/#comment-28531</link>
		<dc:creator>bb in GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginandtacos.com/?p=3741#comment-28531</guid>
		<description>Bill:

I don&#039;t know if your &quot;selfish&quot; round was shotgun or rifle.  

But I think your are stereotyping some.  Most of the people in my &quot;inner circle&quot; are givers, both of their time and money for non-political, benevolent works to help those who life has shat upon and those who have made piss poor decisions.  

I&#039;m a board member, friend, contributor, and worker bee for a ministry for homeless, drug-addicted, and ex-offender men who want a shot at starting over.  

We are mostly privately funded (applying for some United Way money this year) and we also develop good work habits in our Program members.  We have even applied for Fed $, but didn&#039;t make the cut.  So I guess I&#039;m a very practical Libertarian :-)

//bb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know if your &#034;selfish&#034; round was shotgun or rifle.  </p>
<p>But I think your are stereotyping some.  Most of the people in my &#034;inner circle&#034; are givers, both of their time and money for non-political, benevolent works to help those who life has shat upon and those who have made piss poor decisions.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m a board member, friend, contributor, and worker bee for a ministry for homeless, drug-addicted, and ex-offender men who want a shot at starting over.  </p>
<p>We are mostly privately funded (applying for some United Way money this year) and we also develop good work habits in our Program members.  We have even applied for Fed $, but didn&#039;t make the cut.  So I guess I&#039;m a very practical Libertarian :-)</p>
<p>//bb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

