The photos of the "crowds" at the tank parade remind me of when Bill Hicks would come on stage in an almost-empty club, scan the room slowly, and announce "I've had more people in bed than this" ...
When the president sends a cabinet member on TV to announce "We are using the military to liberate an American city from its elected leaders," where do you go from there. What is left to say. The idea of that being anything short of a near-universal "Wait, what the fuck is going on" moment proves how far we've backslid.
This is from 2022 but it was absolutely right. The practiced buffoonery of Trump 1, all the "just kiddings" and "seriously but not literallys" absolutely succeeded in desensitizing people who are hardly paying any attention to the harder stuff they always intended to do next. ...
The basic fallacy in chasing votes by being "tough on immigration" is that the modal American's position on the issue is "Deport the Bad ones and keep the Good ones," and they alone know who is which, and that simply does not translate into workable policy. So this kind of gestapo stuff horrifies some of the same people who cheered when Trump promised to do it. There are true sociopaths who love this, but "No, I meant only the BAD immigrants! Not my coworker/friend/neighbor!" is as likely a reaction as enthusiasm. You cannot do immigration policy that satisfies these people because what they want is nonsensical.
So by the time center-left parties fully commit to chasing the far right by "getting tough" on immigration, the backlash has already begun to build and they walk right into it. "I thought you people wanted this!" No, they want something impossible and convinced themselves they'd could have it - the "eat whatever you want AND lose weight!" of immigration policies.
It is hard to grasp but large masses of Americans are both racist/xenophobic AND not racist/xenophobic enough to applaud what Trump is doing. It's goldilocks shit, they want a level of racism/xenophobia calibrated exactly to their personal preferences, and you just can't make that policy. Don't try. ...
AP: Trump extends olive branch, invites Musk to White House cellar to taste some brand new amontillado ...
hR says:
Being a person of discriminating taste, but one who knows absolutely nothing about sports, I have to say that I don't even see a remarkable difference between the two styles of uniform. But I don't really see any swooshes or fake abstract designs in the top picture, so maybe it's just the shot you chose.
Z says:
I say you're right for about 80 percent of throwbacks. My 9ers certainly look great in the Joe Montana-era duds, and not just because it brings back memories of the dominance we exhibited while wearing them full-time.
But occasionally teams feel the need to throw their uniforms back to the ugliest thing they could come up with, almost as if the ugliness of the fad unis of the early 80s was in and of itself charming, and thus deserving of a teary-eyed look from the present day.
And some teams, like San Diego, originated during the years when ugliness was in fashion, and never really had a chance to look like the Steelers or Oilers in the photo you provide. The lucky ones were lucky because they played back when it was a game, not a fashion show.
Mark S. says:
I hate the abstract designs on most of the helmets, and the color schemes are all off (purple, black, metallic blue).
ec says:
YES!!!
professor fate says:
Well the Jets keep using their Titan's era throwbacks which are just ugly as hell. Still the old Detroit Unis look better than the current ones.
A Mendoza says:
The best throwback – IMHO – is the Buffalo Bills uni. You can't go wrong with the classic buffalo nickel design. Frickin' awesome.
I felt bad for Kansas City today – they had a very humiliating throwback experience. They had to wear their Dallas Texans gear with an outline of the state of Texas on their helmets while playing the Dallas Cowboys.
And it sucks to be Jacksonville and Carolina – no throwbacks to replace their hideous helmets that look like they came from an 80's-era action figure toy box.
jazzbumpa says:
No one in any sport from golf to bowling to soccer to baseball has better uniforms today than 50 years ago.
Clearly you did not see the Bronco's puckifying original equipment display today.
Now, I'll grant you, it was only 49 years ago, not 50, when they first disgraced themselves, the AFL, the U.S. of A. and humanity itself by appearing in public so horribly attired. They won that first game – by way of atonement, no doubt. And they discarded those uniforms after their second year.
Still – I attribute their first 13 years of futility to the embarrassment and chagrin caused by the ugliest outfits ever seen in North America.
Daniel says:
I love sports throwbacks. Buffalo Sabres, Patriots, Chargers, and any baseball uniforms from the early part of the century look super sharp. I never thought the powder blue uniforms of about 8 MLB teams from the seventies and eighties look good except the KC unis. I also think the modern day Broncos and Pats uniforms look too similar for my tastes. The nineties had a big trend of having the team logo stretched across the whole helmet. Pats, Jags, Panthers, Broncs, etc. Browns unis are the best in football for my money.
Ed says:
I don't know – the Broncos throwbacks almost fall under the So Ugly You Have to Admire Them category. I mean, objectively they're hideous. But there's a car wreck-like quality about them. You just keep staring at it until it starts to make sense.
Parrotlover77 says:
Sorry, Ed. Every throwback uniform I've seen reminds me why they are throwbacks and not current! The Oilers' large derrik just looks like a silly worship of an outdated technology. The Creamsickle looks like a normal uniform was washed with bleach. And the Broncos? Oh god, the Broncos. That was such a sad display.
Christina says:
I…can't tell the difference. They're all buff men in tight spandex and as such, it's all good.
Another Luke says:
But did you see the old Broncos uniforms yesterday? Egads.
Link: http://sports.yahoo.com/fantasy/blog/roto_arcade/post/Sunday-Scene-Week-5-Denver-please-throw-em-b?urn=fantasy,195226
Now that doesn't mean I like the current Denver uniforms with the swoosh-y flame-y horsehead (I liked the ones from the 80s with the bucking horse and the "D"), but those AFL uniforms were AWFUL.
Twisted_Colour says:
This is how a football player should look.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OMLYyLC8HTo/R_EM6pKuQVI/AAAAAAAAGD0/D49_jmzzqF0/s400/Adam+McPhee4.jpg